Write an argument paper is which you present at least three reasons to support a conclusion that you have reached on a controversial,contemporary social/political issue in Canada today. Each of your reasons must be supported by your research for the A1 assignment.
In this argument paper specific consideration is given on the scope of women's sport in the media of Canada. The issue is that the Canadian media pay less attention to women‟s sports coverage than men. Moreover, the media must pay more consideration to Women‟s Sports. In my previous work I have come to a conclusion that the women's sport is usually under-represented in Canadian media, but during the Olympic Games, the quantity of information grows, and the women's sports within the sports medium is covered without depth (Wensing & Bruce, 2003). Here I will state the reasons for which I have come to such a conclusion. First of all, I support women‟s participation in the sport but according to this piece the Canadian Media pay lesser attention to the coverage of women in this sphere.
In the examination of the contemporary spot of women's sports in Canadian media it is imperative to decide the nature of data given to the media on women's sports. Indeed, even a superficial examination of texts demonstrates that the sports media concentrate on the actuality that physiologically open doors for men and ladies are distinctive, therefore they add to the fortifying of data in the mind of the picture of ladies. One approach to recognize ladies as the weaker gender is the structure of women's sports as a different classification (Birrell & Theberge, 1994). Therefore, even the counterfeit division of the sporting world into 2 separate territories plainly outlines the sex differences in games (Kennedy & Hills, 2015). Women‟s game is not just individual, it surrenders by the number and nature of data gave by the media about the men's games.
Practically speaking, this prompts the minimization of Women‟s games structure, which thusly shows itself in decreasing enthusiasm of games media to 3 Women‟s games, and at times in an uncommon way to deal with its highlighting. Also, female competitors are called by names (male competitors for the most part alluded to by name) or as Lady (Mathesen & Flatten, 1996).
Moreover, sports media underline the contrasts in the middle of men and ladies and reduce sports abilities of women. Supporters of the sexual picture of ladies competitors assert that women's sports is only an approach to obtain advertising, in light of the fact that generally games couldn't get financing and access to the media. Without a doubt, attractive female picture is gainful to some sportswomen; however that is not a principle. In this way, women‟s game is by and large under-spoke to in Canadian media (Wensing & Bruce, 2003). In spite of the fact that amid significant universal rivalries, and above all else, amid the Olympic Games, the measure of data on it develops, the women‟s games in the sports media is secured without profundity. This is an imperative sign that the belief system of manliness is as yet acting through games media (Mathesen & Flatten, 1996). According to a research female coverage in the sports arena, ranges from 0 to almost 22%, and many studies had found that women receives less than 9% of routined newspaper or television sports coverage. Additionally, instead of a relentless upward pattern as women‟s participation in the sports had augmented, the studies uncover reliably low levels of scope, with women‟s game lesser than 6% of all games scope as of late as the mid-1990s). “Women are invisible” was the rundown of a late study including 38 daily papers in ten nations which discovered an average of just 5% of coverage are going to ladies (Jorgensen, 2002). Moreover, when mixed coverage was incorporated, females showed up in just 13% of the entire sports coverage (Pollster.com, 2014). Media all through the English-talking world takes after the same 4 example of male-dominated games reporting. For instance, Canadian daily papers distributed a little more than 7% of games coverage to ladies (Crossman, Hyslop, & Guthrie, 1994).