Common core math is the new thing in mathematics. It rebelled against the stagnancy of **mathematics** problems just requiring humdrum calculations. Students have often complained about math being challenging or having out-of-syllabus questions. Still, the truth is that the cross-linking of the toughness of questions to non–neuronal firing is accurate. It means that if the human mind doesn’t relate real practical life with the question asked, it becomes rugged by design, not by choice.

To counter this rigmarole-oriented mathematical pedantry requires an escapist approach that sets questions in such a way. That it sets the tone such that person anticipates the next question himself. It can only happen if such interaction happens both ways, i.e. a person can’t expect the following parts of questions until and unless. He is ready to think in a set pattern of reasonably framed questions to be asked in order. It can only happen in kindergarten. Math formulas are unpalatable and desiccated from academic pragmatism necessary for neuronal firing. Suppose we align two opposites, i.e. abstract reasoning and practical examples. In that case, it acts as a fiery cocktail, and we get fantastic individuals in a society that is not a robot.

**Common Core Math Examples**

Most common examples are that of time, distance, speed etc. for instance, a train moves between 2 stations with a distance of 100 km between them at a rate of 60 km/h. How long will it take to complete the journey? Now questions like this set the tone of practicality, i.e. people can relate to the question and have experienced such a thing.

Now it is up to the examiner since he practically has the finger of the student in his hand and can guide his curiosity in any direction. So the next question can be if two trains start simultaneously and one is slower than the other with 10kmph. Then, what if a fly travels between trains facing each other at 30kmph, and 35kmph? Then what do flights, etc. travel the total distance? Please carefully notice the pattern we are trying to follow. Here is to start with a relatable question and make the question more and more difficult. So the solver begins feeling that he is there where all this is happening—an abrupt increase in the difficulty of questions per class based on a topic. The Topic looks like a linear and monotonous exercise that doesn’t consider the nonlinear progress the mind can make.

## Math Standards Common Core

Based on international models of brain development and having some standardized knowledge progression, the USA has set what is known as core math standards. It has developed some standards, i.e. a person has to learn so and so concepts by this. Class is based on how neuronal networks start making sense of the environment at any age. Common core math worksheets are readily available on the internet; now, even the text is flooded with multiple-part questions.

All these fall in that category only. 46 states have implemented common core standards, including California. These standards started with the USA and are still confined to that part of the world, which is a shame. **The USA** also realized quite late in the 1990s that if they wanted to remain world leaders. They needed some overarching process of mathematical calibration in public. That seems to die once they graduate. The only way we can keep the fire of enlightenment ablaze in the general demographic is per class comparison process with the standardized list.

**Hence**, it is a great initiative that has percolated to second and third-world countries at least in question setting mechanism if not directly as a legislature. This thing will at least ensure cognitive survival in a world where mathematical ignorance can practically mean death. We need to solve more of these questions to get a good hand at making abstract and bookish meet these effectively, making subjects “cool”. Congratulations, USA, for such a novel initiative.